Begin with the decision the NGO must make
An NGO planning a project in Burkina Faso needs more than a starting percentage. A baseline must explain whose circumstances are being measured, which services or behaviours are relevant, and how the same indicators can be measured again. Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso offer two useful fieldwork perspectives: a capital with concentrated institutions and urban consumers and a trading and industrial centre in the west. The locations can expose differences that a single-city pilot might miss, but they are not, on their own, a national sample.
Start with a decision workshop involving programme management, monitoring staff and implementing partners. Identify the decisions that cannot be made responsibly without new evidence: which groups should be prioritised, whether a service gap is primarily about distance or quality, and what magnitude of change the programme expects. Translate each decision into two or three answerable baseline questions. This process prevents the survey from becoming a catalogue of interesting indicators that nobody will use. Record how the resulting findings will influence location selection, budgeting or programme design.
Understand how research geography works in Burkina Faso
Fieldwork should follow the administrative vocabulary used in Burkina Faso: regions, provinces and communes. These structures help researchers identify the correct boundaries, local gatekeepers and likely sources of population lists, but they do not automatically supply a complete probability sampling frame. First establish which boundaries apply to the actual programme area, then verify maps and household or facility counts. Administrative labels should be used only after checking their exact local meaning and relationship to the study population. Before committing to a location, review current security, displacement patterns and partner access. Do not pressure enumerators or respondents to travel to unsafe sites simply to fill geographic quotas. A smaller ethically feasible study with stated limits is preferable to a nominally broad but unsafe design.
Define the target population and sampling frame
An apparently generous sample can still be biased if interviewers recruit only easy-to-reach people. Specify the universe, inclusion criteria, sampling units, contact procedures and treatment of refusals before fieldwork. Stratification can help protect key geographic or social groups when those groups are defined in advance. Consider whether monitoring requires a repeated cross-section or a panel; a panel creates stronger individual tracking but adds attrition and confidentiality duties. Report limitations as part of the methodological finding, not as an afterthought.
Baseline research in Ouagadougou: designing the first city sample
In Ouagadougou, where the city functions as a capital with concentrated institutions and urban consumers, a baseline might start with an inventory of programme catchments and service points. If the intervention concerns food security and cash assistance, the field team should test measures of food consumption patterns, payment experience, market access and coping strategies. Interviewer routes should deliberately cover selected neighbourhoods rather than concentrating around accessible offices and major roads. Compare the register of intended participants with people who actually use services; discrepancies may expose targeting or access problems. Whether the unit is a household, young person, facility or beneficiary must remain consistent through analysis.
Baseline research in Bobo-Dioulasso: testing a contrasting city context
Bobo-Dioulasso deserves an independent field plan because it is a trading and industrial centre in the west. Before importing the Ouagadougou questionnaire unchanged, conduct a short cognitive pilot and verify where the target population resides, travels and receives services. The sample allocation should reflect the stated comparison question, not an arbitrary equal split made for convenience. If the NGO needs a comparison between the two cities, agree the minimum precision and subgroup coverage needed. Findings should describe the observed difference without attributing it automatically to geography or programme performance.
Build indicators that can be measured again
Programme dashboards often group together activity counts, outputs and outcomes, but a baseline primarily needs interpretable starting values for the intended results. Define what counts as a person reached, a household with access, a user satisfied or a facility functioning. For sensitive measures, confirm privacy before selecting a mode. Set out missing-value rules and calculation conventions in advance. This protects the study from retrospective threshold-setting once the team has seen the data.
Choose appropriate survey and qualitative methods
Use methods that match the people and the evidence. Face-to-face computer-assisted interviews can support structured household selection and physical verification, but require travel and supervision. Telephone interviews may suit valid beneficiary contact lists, while online forms can work for genuinely connected professional audiences. They should not be used to exclude offline populations and then presented as population-wide findings. Combine surveys with key informant interviews, observations or small-group discussions when the NGO needs to understand why a pattern exists. Keep qualitative insight distinct from statistically estimated prevalence.
Translate and pilot instruments for local respondents
Tools and consent scripts should be tested in French and languages including Mooré and Dioula. A language that works for a formal meeting may not be the clearest language for a household interview, and bilingual respondents may switch vocabulary when describing sensitive experiences. Prepare a glossary for core constructs, reconcile translations with the source questionnaire and role-play difficult questions. Recruit interviewers for language competence and cultural familiarity, not only device skills. Translation changes need recorded approval so that future midline and endline rounds can preserve conceptual equivalence.
Design field operations around actual access conditions
Operationally, access conditions must be reviewed daily and protection of field staff prioritised. Plan interviewer assignments, transport, safe operating hours, supervision and escalation around this reality. An initial reconnaissance visit can check listing feasibility, accessibility, the actual duration of an interview and any mismatch between administrative maps and lived settlement boundaries. A rigorous pilot should include sample-selection rehearsal, consent practice, skip-logic tests and mock data submission. Budget for replacements that comply with the original selection procedure rather than allowing opportunistic substitution when a respondent is absent.
Protect consent, privacy and vulnerable participants
Informed consent should explain the study purpose, voluntary participation, the expected length of contact and the treatment of personal information. Beneficiaries must not assume that declining an interview will affect their assistance. Collect only identifiers needed for follow-up, store contact lists separately from analytical data, and restrict access according to role. Sensitive subjects may require private interview spaces, interviewer matching or referral procedures. Review applicable permissions and data-protection obligations locally before fieldwork rather than relying on a generic pan-African consent script.
Check quality while fieldwork is still active
A strong fieldwork control room watches more than the number of completes. It tracks sample progress, refusals, subgroup balance, interview duration, interviewer-level anomalies and unresolved incidents. Supervisors should review records daily while corrective action is possible. Back-check a defined selection of interviews, protect respondent confidentiality and investigate rather than automatically punish statistical outliers. Keep a log of tool changes, retraining and replacements so the final analysis can explain exactly what happened in the field.
Analyse change without overstating causal claims
Before writing the narrative, reconcile sample outcomes, missing data and indicator calculations. Tables should distinguish raw counts, valid percentages and weighted estimates as appropriate. Discuss plausible contextual explanations without attributing causes that were not tested. A useful final discussion links each finding to an operational question, such as targeting, access, implementation capacity or future monitoring. Archive the questionnaire, codebook, cleaning syntax and sampling notes so the next round can reproduce the approach.
Turn baseline evidence into action in Burkina Faso
For a hypothetical NGO programme focused on food security and cash assistance, the useful deliverable is not simply a table showing food consumption patterns, payment experience, market access and coping strategies. It is an explanation of which barriers can be addressed through the intervention and which reflect factors outside programme control. If participants know a service exists but rarely use it, explore cost, location, opening time, quality, trust and social norms. Recommend a response only when the evidence distinguishes among those explanations. The baseline should also register external shocks and programme exposure dates to protect later interpretation.
At the end of the exercise, the NGO should be able to say what the baseline means for Burkina Faso, what it means specifically for Ouagadougou and Bobo-Dioulasso, and what it does not mean. Set a schedule for repeating core indicators, preferably at comparable seasonal periods. Keep the sample frame, contact protocol, questionnaire versions, interview-date records and calculation syntax. Use a short management session to decide whether targeting, staffing, communication or referral practices should change. Record those decisions so the endline can examine both outcomes and the adaptation process.
What a useful baseline report should deliver
A strong Burkina Faso baseline report should provide a clearly defined study population, an honest sampling account, accepted-interview totals, response outcomes, reproducible indicators and accessible recommendations. City comparisons should carry their own denominators and limitations. The report can be supported by a clean dataset, fieldwork memo, codebook and monitoring matrix, for internal analysis and subsequent measurement rounds. Any gaps in coverage should be visible so implementers can decide whether further listing or targeted qualitative inquiry is needed before expanding activities.
How Surveysphere Africa can support
Surveysphere Africa helps NGOs and development organisations design baseline studies, define indicators, plan samples, manage fieldwork, verify data quality and turn findings into actionable programme decisions. For work involving Ouagadougou, Bobo-Dioulasso or wider coverage in Burkina Faso, the research design should begin with the intended decision and the population it needs to represent, then adapt responsibly to the local context.
Related guidance
For the continent-wide view, read our guide to baseline, midline and endline studies.
Our services for research in Burkina Faso
We run research across African markets. Start with these services for work in Burkina Faso:
- Monitoring, evaluation and learning in Burkina Faso: Baseline, midline, endline and programme evaluation.
- Social and development research in Burkina Faso: Qualitative and quantitative studies for social and development programmes.
We also offer: Outsourced fieldwork, Market and consumer research, Public health research, Policy, economic and institutional research, Data analytics and insights visualisation.
